What
questions are fair game and which ones The Virtual Editorials - E15 (Aug. 14, 2005) - Dennis Foster |
||
Introduction: Our swan song for the Virtual Editorial Board II. | ||
Virtual Editorial #15 |
||
A Supreme Court justice has enormous power. Yet, if they do
their job properly, they will exercise very little power. It
sounds like some kind of Zen thing, but there you go.
We were singularly blessed by the group of men that fashioned, and
championed, our constitution. Our laws flow from this
constitution. Fundamentally, judges should apply the law; not
make the law. A Supreme Court justice must be vigilant in
keeping at bay those that would bend the constitution.
So, what questions should, or shouldn’t, be asked of Judge Roberts?
There is only one question I am interested in – “Do you promise to
rigorously apply the Constitution of the United States to the cases
that come before the high court?” Nothing else matters. |
||
Afterword: The more I thought about it, the more amazed I am at how lucky we were to get the constitution we got. Sure, the Constitution Congress came up with a lousy way to deal with slavery, but what could they do? That they came up with such a great system, which was premised on limited government and individual liberty, is nothing short of astounding. How easy it would have been to codify an oligarchy. Well, then there was the stuff about women, and you had to have land. Still, despite all the shortcomings, a remarkable accomplishment. No way would I trust our current crop of politicians to come up with a constitution. In Europe, the EU constitution is many hundreds of pages long! And, apparently, all for naught, given the recent vote in France. | ||